Comparing the Internet Communications FURL site to an HTML was quite contrasting. The furl site was much more vibrant and colourful, as the html site merely consisted of a simple list with links to relevant course work while the FURL site is much more graphic intensive, interactive and not as linear in its content.
I guess HTML would be good for simple, straight forward content/lists that do not require much explanation and user interactivity, as all you can really do is read and click on the links.
The FURL site was much more user interactive, allowing you to see what other users were active at the time, what sites/articles they had visited the rankings the links had attained. It definitely has a much more community feel to it along the same lines as Facebook and other social networks, as opposed to just a list with articles on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment